|
| |
|
May 26, 2009. Palo Alto, CA. Police Service |
Fatekh
Vergasov
|
|
Traffic ticket H 615782
|
From:
Sstrafficnc@scscourt.org
To: Fatekh Vergasov
cc:
sstrafficinfo@scscourt.org
Date: 07/09/2009 08:49AM
Subject: RE: Traffic ticket H 615782, Silence gives consent.
Am I right?
According to our records, you have contacted Palo Alto
facility today 7/9/09,
and all the options were explained.
Please follow the instructions and respond by the due date.
Traffic staff
From:
Fatekh Vergasov
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:49 AM
To:
Sstrafficnc@scscourt.org
Cc:
sstrafficinfo@scscourt.org
Subject: RE: Traffic ticket H 615782, Silence gives
consent. Am I right?
Hello,
Would you please schedule date and time, when I can “discuss
my concern with Judge”, as you advised me
Thanks
Fatekh Vergasov
From:
Fatekh Vergasov
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 12:04 PM
To: 'Sstrafficnc@scscourt.org'
Subject: RE: Traffic ticket H 615782, Silence gives consent.
Am I right?
Hi,
Would you
please explain me in detail - the difference between these two
options advised:
-
“discuss
your concerns with the judge” and
-
“court
trial”
I mean –
procedure, money matter, meaning and consequences, outcome,
aftereffects, etc/
It sounds like
meeting with Judge will be more reasonable/ Am I right?
I’m confused
with the following. Traffic Ticket signed by me says: I must
appear at Court no later then July 15, 2009.
Otherwise I may be
arrested… I already was one at the Courthouse a had conversation
with officer at window…
Now you tell: “Your due date is August
10, 2009”. If I will follow this date I may be arrested by
Police? What to do?
Thanks
Fatekh Vergasov
From:
Sstrafficnc@scscourt.org [mailto:Sstrafficnc@scscourt.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 11:16 AM
To: fv1946@sbcglobal.net
Subject: FW: Traffic ticket H 615782, Silence gives
consent. Am I right?
Forwarded by Sstraffic Info/Superior Court on 07/06/2009
02:06PM
To:
<sstrafficinfo@scscourt.org>
From: "Fatekh Vergasov" <fv1946@sbcglobal.net>
Date: 07/06/2009 01:20PM
cc: <citymgr@cityofpaloalto.org>,
<steve.herrera@cityofpaloalto.org>
Subject: FW: Traffic ticket H 615782, Silence gives consent. Am
I right?
Please schedule a court date to discuss your concerns with the
judge. Your due date is 8/10/09. You can either come to the
clerk's office and schedule a court date or request a court date
through the mail by posting $332.00. If you wish to schedule a
court trial, must post the the bail amount of $332.00 by mail or
in person.
Traffic staff
From:
Fatekh Vergasov
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 6:18 PM
To: 'city Attorney -
attorney@cityofpaloalto.org
Subject:
Traffic ticket H
615782, Silence gives consent. Am I right?
Hi,
My small conflict with local Police Service raised big
problems in the City Police Service…
They try to serve some abstract Letter of Law and disregard
spirit of Local Law…
Would you please teach Palo Alto Police Service some basic
things like:
-
Does Police Service belong to the United States
Government or it is Local unit ?
-
Whom to the Power in this City belongs by City’s
Constitution or Document similar to it?
-
What does it means “Service”?
-
How friendly Service must be to us, i.e. local
residents, most of whom are old people and are not
punks?
-
What kind of service we (residents of the City) expect
from Police Service?
Thus current task is to turn Police Service 180 degree and
make them really Local
Thank you
Fatekh Vergasov
From: Fatekh Vergasov
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 4:39 PM
To: 'Herrera, Steve'
-
steve.herrera@cityofpaloalto.org
Cc: 'City Mgr'
-
citymgr@cityofpaloalto.org
Subject: RE:
Traffic
ticket H 615782, Silence gives consent. Am I right?
Steve,
I don't treat you and your officers like enemies or party, so
why should I go to the Court?
If I'm not right, just prove it to me with material evidences
in your hands...
If you don't have evidences, just be honest and recall your
claim from the Court and annul (void) the case, by default - no
case may exist without material evidence...
Does this (to be simply honest) is beyond your strength?
Fatekh Vergasov
From:
Herrera, Steve
Sent:
Monday, July 06, 2009 2:21 PM
To: Fatekh Vergasov;
sstrafficinfo@scscourt.org
Cc: City Mgr
-
citymgr@cityofpaloalto.org
Subject: RE:
Traffic
ticket H 615782, Silence gives consent. Am I right?
Mr. Vergasov,
I have advised you to take this matter to court if you feel
strongly about it. There is nothing else I can do for you so no
further correspondence is necessary.
Sergeant Steve Herrera
From: Fatekh Vergasov
[mailto:fv1946@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 5:12 PM
To: 'sstrafficinfo@scscourt.org'
Subject: RE:
Traffic ticket H
615782, Silence gives consent. Am I right?
Hi,
Thank you for redirecting my e-mail
Would you please provide me e-mail address of your Palo Alto
Facility?
I believe it is not “Top secret of America”
Thanks
Fatekh Vergasov
From:
sstrafficinfo@scscourt.org
[mailto:sstrafficinfo@scscourt.org]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 2:08 PM
To:
Sstrafficnc@scscourt.org
Cc: fv1946@sbcglobal.net
Subject: FW:
Traffic ticket H
615782, Silence gives consent. Am I right?
You have sent this email to the wrong court. I am forwarding
your email to the Palo Alto Facility.
Records & Research/Traffic Court
From: Fatekh Vergasov
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 1:20 PM
Palo
Alto Courthouse, Traffic Court -
sstrafficinfo@scscourt.org
CC:
City of Palo Alto Manager -
citymgr@cityofpaloalto.org
CC: Sergeant
Steve
Herrera
-
steve.herrera@cityofpaloalto.org
Subject:
Traffic ticket H
615782, Silence gives consent. Am I right?
Hi,
Regarding all these (see below,
please), I have several questions:
Police service of Palo Alto
does not have any material evidence of so called my "speed
violation".
What do they really have in fact?
a. Some plastic thing shown to
me through the dirty window of the police car from the
distance
20-25 feet…
b. Readiness to give "the
testimony" under oath without any material proofs
c.
Unexplainable confidence that any honorable Judge will permit to
convert his Court into fair booth or farce
Thus,
they really have only obvious intention to make me pay
either admitting that I've committed something I have
probably not or for me to pay the lawyer
So, after I got from them they
response (see below, please), I see that there is no case at all and Police
service should recall the Citation and their Claim to Court
P.S. They are just keeping silence since
June 15, 2009
Silence gives consent. Am I right?
Fatekh Vergasov
From: Fatekh Vergasov
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 4:35 PM
To: 'Herrera, Steve'-
steve.herrera@cityofpaloalto.org
Cc:
City of
Palo Alto Manager 'citymgr@cityofpaloalto.org'
Subject: RE: Traffic ticket H 615782
Steve,
First.
Yes, some plastic tool was shown to me by your officer from the
distance about 20-25 feet…through the dirty police car glass… I
have no idea, what the tool was, where and when he got it, how
he did speed measurement, what car he measured, etc. That’s why
I still doubt an not sure…
So, you have
no material proof or evidence… just your officer testimony,
given under oath?
I’ll make my
testimony under oath…
Why your
officer oath is more valuable than mine?
So we both
will just abuse His honesty Judge with our honest statements…
What justice
is expected to be?
Second.
Law, Codes, Authority, salary, ammunition, equipment, etc. was
given to your service department not by God, and said stuff is
not working by itself… all mentioned were given to your service!
Department by Palo Alto people…your local Principal and Giver…
Addition: Law, Code, etc. is just model of Life, which is much
more complex and richer… So, don't even try to play Automat or
“Messenger of the God”, please…
Law and Code
were given to you with hope that you’ll use not against your
Principal, i.e. you do understand the difference…. Otherwise
Palo Alto people just don’t need any human being in the Police
service! We would use rattle-pated (brainless) automatic
devices… But we preferred humans being… So, you have no choice,
but match to our expectations, please…
So, your
statement is good in formal point of view only….
Common sense question:
If anybody will keep in his household any pet, which try to soil
everywhere or even bite the Owner of the house, i.e. who is not
tolerant, non-judgmental to it’s Giver?
Fatekh Vergasov
From: Herrera, Steve
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:20 PM
To: Fatekh Vergasov
Cc: City Mgr; Brown, Sandra; Kilpatrick, Brad
Subject: RE: Traffic ticket H 615782
Mr. Vergasov,
I think you might
be a little confused as to what I can do for you. Apparently the
front desk personnel either didn’t convey my message or you didn’t
understand it.
My original
instructions were for you to request the radar gun information using
the proper avenue and that would be through the court system. Seeing
that there is some confusion, I will attempt to explain things to
you.
There are no
internal records kept by the radar device nor are there printouts of
the speed readings. The only proof is either looking at the radar
unit at the scene or listening to the testimony, given under oath,
by the officer in court. Regarding the first solution, the officer
is under no requirement to show you the radar unit but I’m sure if
you had asked, the Officer would have showed it to you. However,
this is not to say that he is required to do so. Certain safety
issues prevent him from doing so at times.
The evidence of
your speed violation is presented in court, under oath, by the
Officer. You have an opportunity to testify on your behalf and ask
questions of the Officer.
I am grateful that
you and your fellow taxpayers provide us with all we need to perform
our job but we are sworn to enforce all laws, without preference or
favor, to all. We would be remiss to do it any differently and in
fact would most likely be accused of profiling non-residents if we
did so. I’m sure you don’t want us to do that.
We pride ourselves
on providing good service and I believe we have accomplished that.
There are multiple studies showing that speed is a factor in a
majority of accidents. If you were to talk to a high percentage of
the residents who request service in their neighborhoods, you will
find the common theme is speed.
I encourage you to
take this matter to court if you feel strongly about it.
Sergeant
Steve Herrera
From: Fatekh Vergasov
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 1:51 PM
To: Steve Herrera (steve.herrera@cityofpaloalto.org)
Cc: City of Palo Alto Manager 'citymgr@cityofpaloalto.org'
Subject: Traffic ticket H 615782
Steve,
At May 26, 2009 I was
given a ticket, which states my car speed 53 miles per hour, which was
measured by speed gun (officer ID 142)…
But, I’m still not
sure about that speed… and it is not attempt to dispute this matter… I
just doubt… and I want to be 100% sure…
So would you please
give me an opportunity to said gun record and other evidences which
prove speed statement mentioned above… If you have sufficient evidences
of my speed violation, just show it to me and I’ll found peaceful and
friendly solution of the case without disturbing noble and busy people
of the Curt…
Helpfulness
friendliness and good service – that’s what we - local residents
taxpayers and electors of Palo Alto, - have right to expect from our
Police service!
Especially as we gave
you almost everything to fulfill you mission: Municipal Law and Codes,
Authority to act, Competence, uniforms, salary and equipment… about 120
000 cars-visitors per day, whom you are free to enforce day and night,
in all weathers, rain or shine, wet or fine…
Kindly
Fatekh Vergasov
Legis
www.pseudology.org
|
|